From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. Howard

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 9, 1985
468 So. 2d 310 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 84-301.

April 4, 1985. Rehearings Denied May 9, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Orange County, B.C. Muszynski, J.

Seymour Benson, Orlando, for appellant.

William A. Greenburg, of Greenburg Lester, Fern Park, for appellee.


The trial court found that "[t]here has been a change in circumstances due to the increase of the cost of living and the increased needs of the child, requiring a modification of the court's prior Order," and increased the child support from $45.00 per week to $65.00 per week. The wife appeals, contending that the amount is insufficient.

We agree. An increase of $20.00 per week to a total of $65.00 per week is facially inadequate for the support of the eleven year old child in the light of the father's earnings in excess of $100,000.00 for the year in which the order was entered. See Vandergriff v. Vandergriff, 456 So.2d 464 (Fla. 1984).

We reverse the order appealed from and remand the case to the trial court with directions to take such additional testimony as may be required, and to enter an order more appropriate to the father's ability to provide needed support. Appellant's remaining issues are without merit.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Howard v. Howard

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 9, 1985
468 So. 2d 310 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Howard v. Howard

Case Details

Full title:JO A. HOWARD, APPELLANT, v. LANGSTON B. HOWARD, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: May 9, 1985

Citations

468 So. 2d 310 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

Rook v. Rook

In addition, the child support award in this case is "facially inadequate" or "facially insufficient." See…

Martin v. Martin

Both parents should support the child, to the extent of their present abilities. Howard v. Howard, 468 So.2d…