From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Houston v. Neven

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Aug 14, 2018
No. 74173 (Nev. App. Aug. 14, 2018)

Opinion

No. 74173

08-14-2018

TITUS LEE HOUSTON, Appellant, v. D. W. NEVEN, WARDEN; HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON; OFFENDER MANAGEMENT DIVISION; AND THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondents.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Titus Lee Houston appeals from an order of the district court denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Linda Marie Bell, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument and we conclude the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. NRAP 34(f)(3), (g).

In his July 28, 2017, petition, Houston claimed the Nevada Department of Corrections improperly denied him the opportunity to earn work credits or program credits. Houston had no right to employment while in prison. See NRS 209.4465(2); NRS 209.461(1)(b); Collins v. Palczewski, 841 F. Supp. 333, 336-37 (D. Nev. 1993) (recognizing a prisoner has no independent constitutional right to employment and the Nevada statutes do not mandate employment). Houston also did not have a right to attend the prison's educational programs. See NRS 209.387; NRS 209.389(4). Therefore, Houston cannot demonstrate that lack of employment or program attendance and the resulting lack of opportunity to earn statutory credits violated any protected right. Accordingly, we conclude the district court did not err by denying these claims.

Next, Houston sought the appointment of postconviction counsel, but the district court denied Houston's request. The appointment of postconviction counsel was discretionary in this matter. See NRS 34.750(1). After a review of the record, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in this regard as this matter was not sufficiently complex so as to warrant the appointment of postconviction counsel. See Renteria-Novoa v. State, 133 Nev. ___, ___, 391 P.3d 760, 760-61 (2017). Accordingly, we

We have considered Houston's October 20, 2017, motion for counsel and conclude no relief is warranted. --------

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Hon. Linda Marie Bell, District Judge

Titus Lee Houston

Attorney General/Carson City

Attorney General/Las Vegas

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Houston v. Neven

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Aug 14, 2018
No. 74173 (Nev. App. Aug. 14, 2018)
Case details for

Houston v. Neven

Case Details

Full title:TITUS LEE HOUSTON, Appellant, v. D. W. NEVEN, WARDEN; HIGH DESERT STATE…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 14, 2018

Citations

No. 74173 (Nev. App. Aug. 14, 2018)