From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Household Finance Corp. v. Cage

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. First Division
Oct 6, 1969
253 N.E.2d 675 (Ill. App. Ct. 1969)

Opinion

Gen. No. 53,141.

October 6, 1969.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. GLENN T. JOHNSON, Judge, presiding. Judgment reversed.

Thad B. Eubanks, of Chicago, for appellant.

No brief for appellee.


This is an appeal by Will T. Cage and Loisteen Cage from a default judgment of $337.92 against them in the Circuit Court of Cook County on June 25, 1963, and from an order of February 1, 1968, denying their motion to vacate said judgment. The defendants-appellants seek reversal of said orders by this appeal.

Defendants filed their brief, abstract and record and complied with all statutory requirements and rules of this court. No appearance or brief was filed in this court by the plaintiff-appellee. In Algozino v. Police Board, 111 Ill. App.2d 34, 249 N.E.2d 720, released August 11, 1969, this court ruled that "Where an appellee has not filed a brief in the reviewing court, the order or judgment which is the subject of the appeal may be reversed without consideration of the cause on its merits." The same result was reached in Parkside Realty Co. v. License Appeal Commission, 87 Ill. App.2d 374, 231 N.E.2d 654 (1967) and the cases cited therein.

We conclude that the trial court's orders of June 25, 1963, and of February 1, 1968, are reversed.

Judgment reversed.

MURPHY and BURMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Household Finance Corp. v. Cage

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. First Division
Oct 6, 1969
253 N.E.2d 675 (Ill. App. Ct. 1969)
Case details for

Household Finance Corp. v. Cage

Case Details

Full title:Household Finance Corporation, a Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Will…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. First Division

Date published: Oct 6, 1969

Citations

253 N.E.2d 675 (Ill. App. Ct. 1969)
253 N.E.2d 675

Citing Cases

Winnett v. Winnett

In such a situation the order which is the subject matter of the appeal may, within the discretion of this…