From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Houlihan-Parnes v. Citibank, N.A.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 12, 1980
403 N.E.2d 185 (N.Y. 1980)

Opinion

Submitted January 2, 1980

Decided February 12, 1980

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, LEONARD RUBENFELD, J., GEORGE D. BURCHELL, J.

Stanley Alter for appellants.

Mark P. Zimmett for Citibank, N.A., respondent.

Frank H. Connelly, Jr., for Joel Halpern and others, respondents.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

It being undisputed that no agency or contractual relationship existed between the parties, a cause of action for conspiracy to interfere with that relationship does not lie (Brackett v Griswold, 112 N.Y. 454, 466-467). Hence, defendants were properly granted summary judgment.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Houlihan-Parnes v. Citibank, N.A.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 12, 1980
403 N.E.2d 185 (N.Y. 1980)
Case details for

Houlihan-Parnes v. Citibank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:HOULIHAN-PARNES, Realtors, et al., Appellants, v. CITIBANK, N.A., et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 12, 1980

Citations

403 N.E.2d 185 (N.Y. 1980)
403 N.E.2d 185
426 N.Y.S.2d 480

Citing Cases

Brown Son Realty, Inc. v. Greenberg

This was clearly insufficient proof that the broker was the procuring cause of the sale, an essential…