From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hospelhorn v. Blankman

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Apr 21, 1938
198 A. 598 (Md. 1938)

Opinion

[No. 43, January Term, 1938.]

Decided April 21st, 1938.

Banks and Banking — Assessment on Stock.

Where a firm of brokers, purchasing shares of stock in a banking corporation for a client, had the stock registered in the name of an employee of the firm, though delivering the certificates of stock to their client, held that the employee was liable for an assessment on the stock, as being the registered owner. p. 278

In such case it was error, in an action by the receiver of the corporation against the employee to recover the assessment on the stock, to join the brokers' client, for whom they had purchased the stock, as a defendant. p. 278

Decided April 21st, 1938.

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Baltimore City (DENNIS, C.J.).

Action by John D. Hospelhorn, receiver of the Baltimore Trust Company, against Wilmer P. Smith and Meyer Blankman. From a judgment for defendant Blankman, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

The cause was argued before BOND, C.J., OFFUTT, PARKE, SLOAN, MITCHELL, SHEHAN, and JOHNSON, JJ.

J. Purdon Wright and Arthur W. Machen, with whom was Alexander Armstrong on the brief, for the appellant.

Edward L. Parlett and Lester H. Crowther, for the appellees.


The appeal in this case of John D. Hospelhorn, receiver of the Baltimore Trust Company, plaintiff, against Meyer Blankman and Wilmer P. Smith is the third one of four appeals on the docket of the January term, 1938. The questions raised on these appeals have been stated and the views of the court set forth in the opinion filed in the appeal of John D. Hospelhorn, receiver of the Baltimore Trust Company, against Philip L. Poe, trading as Philip L. Poe Co., which is No. 21 on the appeal docket of this court for the January term, 1938. 198 A. 582.

On September 11th, 1931, certain shares of stock of the Maryland Trust Company were purchased by brokers for the account of Meyer Blankman, a defendant, and the shares of stock were issued to one Wilmer P. Smith, a defendant, and an employee of the brokers, and the stock registered in his name on the books of the company, but the certificates of stock were delivered by the broker to Meyer Blankman as his property and he has retained possession of the certificate, but the stock remained registered in the name of Smith. For the reasons assigned in the opinion in No. 21, Wilmer P. Smith, the registered owner of the stock, is liable for the payment of the assessment. The allegations of the declaration do not show any ground upon which there can be a joinder of Blankman, and, for this misjoinder, the court sustained the demurrer of Blankman. The ruling is sound, and the judgment in favor of Blankman will be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to the appellee.


Summaries of

Hospelhorn v. Blankman

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Apr 21, 1938
198 A. 598 (Md. 1938)
Case details for

Hospelhorn v. Blankman

Case Details

Full title:JOHN D. HOSPELHORN, RECEIVER, v . MEYER BLANKMAN

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Apr 21, 1938

Citations

198 A. 598 (Md. 1938)
198 A. 598

Citing Cases

Hospelhorn v. Poe

The questions on this appeal and those on three other appeals now pending on the current docket are so…

Hospelhorn v. Emerson

Indeed, the statute discloses no attempt on the part of the Legislature to exempt any stockholders from the…