From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hose-McCann Corporation v. Pauluhn

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 11, 1938
13 N.E.2d 54 (N.Y. 1938)

Opinion

Argued December 9, 1937

Decided January 11, 1938

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Daniel Handler for plaintiff, appellant and respondent.

Lewis Ginsburg for defendants, respondents and appellants.



Judgment of the Appellate Division modified by striking therefrom the award of damages on the finding of fraud, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to defendant-appellants. We fail to find in this record any evidence to charge the defendants with knowledge or notice of the fraud or deception of Wieman in obtaining possession of the plaintiff's monophone box or device. The damages awarded by the Appellate Division on the finding of fraud must be reversed, and its judgment, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to defendant-appellants. No opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ.


Summaries of

Hose-McCann Corporation v. Pauluhn

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 11, 1938
13 N.E.2d 54 (N.Y. 1938)
Case details for

Hose-McCann Corporation v. Pauluhn

Case Details

Full title:HOSE-McCANN CORPORATION, Appellant and Respondent, v. CARL PAULUHN et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 11, 1938

Citations

13 N.E.2d 54 (N.Y. 1938)
13 N.E.2d 54

Citing Cases

Hose-McCann Corporation v. Pauluhn

Motion to amend remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 276 N.Y. 669.)…

Biltmore Publishing Co. v. Grayson Publishing Co.

Plaintiff cites cases as authority for the principle that where it is impossible to determine the portion of…