From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horwitz v. American Druggists' Insurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 1985
112 A.D.2d 192 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

July 8, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Cholakis, J.).


Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Plaintiff, a subcontractor, obtained a default judgment against his contractor for a balance due for the installation of floor coverings in a State-owned facility. Plaintiff now seeks to recover the unsatisfied judgment from defendant as surety pursuant to a payment bond executed by defendant and the contractor. The payment bond provided that it was enforceable pursuant to State Finance Law § 137 (4) (b) which states that "[n]o action on a payment bond furnished pursuant to this section shall be commenced after the expiration of one year from the date on which final payment under the claimant's subcontract became due". Since the determinative date on which final payment from the contractor became due to plaintiff cannot be determined from the record, a factual dispute exists which justified Special Term's denial of defendant's motion. The question of whether this action was untimely commenced must therefore await determination after trial. Lazer, J.P., Gibbons, Weinstein and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Horwitz v. American Druggists' Insurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 1985
112 A.D.2d 192 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Horwitz v. American Druggists' Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:SANFORD R. HORWITZ, Doing Business as BERT's, Respondent, v. AMERICAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 8, 1985

Citations

112 A.D.2d 192 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Swing Staging Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.

Unfortunately, the lease was not offered in evidence on the summary judgment motion. The record is thus…

Scaccia Corp v. Hartford Ins. Co.

It should be noted that in Triple Cities, the "whereas" clause of the bond specifically stated that the bond…