Horowitz v. Essary

Full title: SAMUEL HOROWITZ, Petitioner, v. C/O ESSARY and C/O MURRAY, Respondent

Court: United States District Court, S.D. Illinois

Date published: Sep 20, 2006

Civil No. 05-839-MJR (S.D. Ill. Sep. 20, 2006)

Opinion

Civil No. 05-839-MJR.

September 20, 2006

ORDER

CLIFFORD PROUD, Magistrate Judge

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take Deposition Upon Oral examination by Non-Stenographic Means. (Doc. 10).

Plaintiff is a pro se inmate in the custody of the IDOC. He brings suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. An order on preliminary review was entered one on July 17, 2006. See, Doc. 7.

Plaintiff indicates that he wants to take the depositions of unidentified non-party witnesses and of defendants by means of tape recording at Menard Correctional Center. As defendants have not yet entered an appearance, the motion is premature.

Upon consideration and for good cause shown, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take Deposition Upon Oral examination by Non-Stenographic Means (Doc. 10) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.