From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horn v. Sheldon Greene Associates

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 10, 1987
502 So. 2d 421 (Fla. 1987)

Opinion

No. 67843.

January 5, 1987. Rehearing Denied March 10, 1987.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict of Decisions, Third District — Case No. 84-857.

Joseph C. Jacobs and Robert M. Ervin, Jr. of Ervin, Varn, Jacobs, Odom and Kitchen, Tallahassee, for petitioners.

Kevin F. Kline and Donald M. Klein of Kline, Moore and Klein, P.A., Coconut Grove, for respondents.


We granted review of the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal, Sheldon Greene Associates v. Rosinda Investments, N.V., 475 So.2d 925 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), on the basis that it expressly and directly conflicted with Shuler v. Allen, 76 So.2d 879 (Fla. 1955). Upon further examination of the record and reconsideration of the holdings of these two cases, we find they are factually distinguishable. We therefore dismiss the petition for review.

It is so ordered.

McDONALD, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

EHRLICH, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Horn v. Sheldon Greene Associates

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 10, 1987
502 So. 2d 421 (Fla. 1987)
Case details for

Horn v. Sheldon Greene Associates

Case Details

Full title:HARRY HORN AND SALA HORN, HIS WIFE, PETITIONERS, v. SHELDON GREENE…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Mar 10, 1987

Citations

502 So. 2d 421 (Fla. 1987)

Citing Cases

Media Services Group v. Bay Cities Comm

In order to be considered the procuring cause of the sale, "the broker must have brought the [parties]…

Whitehead v. Dreyer

Even assuming as true the allegation that it was Dreyer who had the idea of selling the ranch for mitigation…