From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hopkins v. Cheeseman

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1865
28 Cal. 180 (Cal. 1865)

Opinion

         Writ of Error to the County Court of Solano County.

         August 28, 1863, plaintiff commenced an action against defendants in the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, Solano County, to recover judgment for the sum of two hundred and sixty-eight dollars and seventy-seven cents, alleged to be due plaintiff for work and labor performed for defendants, and for money paid by plaintiff for their use. Defendant Hopkins alone answered. The answer was served and filed on the 28th day of January, 1864. The answer denied the allegations of the complaint, and raised the objection that the Court had no jurisdiction because the amount in controversy was less than three hundred dollars.

         On the 16th of May, 1864, an order was made on motion of defendant, transferring the cause for trial to a Justice's Court in Solano County. Plaintiff had judgment in the Justice's Court, and defendant appealed to the County Court, where plaintiff recovered judgment for two hundred and sixty-eight dollars and seventy-seven cents, and six hundred and eighty-eight dollars and twenty-five cents, costs of suit, for taking care of cattle which had been attached when the suit was commenced. Defendant moved to retax the costs by striking out the costs for keeping attached property, because the Court had no jurisdiction to enter any judgment for such costs. The motion was denied, and defendant excepted. Defendant thereupon brought the case to the Supreme Court by writ of error, for the purpose of reversing the order refusing to strike out said costs.

         COUNSEL

          W. S. Wells, for Plaintiff in error.

         M. A. Wheaton, for Defendant in error.


         JUDGES: Sanderson, C. J.

         OPINION

          SANDERSON, Judge

         The amount in controversy in this case is less than three hundred dollars, and this Court has no jurisdiction either on appeal or writ of error. Let the writ be quashed.


Summaries of

Hopkins v. Cheeseman

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1865
28 Cal. 180 (Cal. 1865)
Case details for

Hopkins v. Cheeseman

Case Details

Full title:MOSES HOPKINS impleaded with G. P. BRONSON v. L. H. CHEESEMAN

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Apr 1, 1865

Citations

28 Cal. 180 (Cal. 1865)

Citing Cases

Winter v. Fitzpatrick

No appeal lies to this Court, because the amount in dispute is less than three hundred dollars. (Hopkins v. …

Garabaldi v. Shattuck

There can be no doubt that a grantor, even with a covenant of warranty, may after his deed is delivered take…