From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoover v. State of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 20, 2011
80 A.D.3d 1020 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 509129.

January 20, 2011.

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Ferreira, J.), entered February 25, 2010, which denied claimant's motion for reargument.

Leroy Hoover, Dannemora, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Robert M. Goldfarb of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Malone Jr., McCarthy and Egan Jr., JJ.


Claimant, an inmate, was allegedly injured in November 2008 when a prison vehicle, in which he was being taken for medical treatment, struck another vehicle. In April 2009, claimant moved for permission to file a late notice of intention to file a claim and to file a claim against defendant for his alleged injuries. The Court of Claims denied the motion and claimant did not file a notice of appeal from that determination. Claimant thereafter moved for reargument. The Court of Claims denied the motion and claimant now appeals from that order. Inasmuch as the denial of a motion for reargument is not appealable, this appeal must be dismissed ( see Matter of Jackson v Smith, 6 AD3d 1016, 1017 n [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 667; Matter of Suarez v Filion, 281 AD2d 743, 744).

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.


Summaries of

Hoover v. State of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 20, 2011
80 A.D.3d 1020 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Hoover v. State of New York

Case Details

Full title:LEROY HOOVER, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 20, 2011

Citations

80 A.D.3d 1020 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 304
914 N.Y.S.2d 691

Citing Cases

Strykiewicz v. Strykiewicz

GARRY, J.P., LYNCH, DEVINE and CLARK, JJ., concur.see Hoover v. State of New York, 80 A.D.3d 1020, 1020, 914…

People ex rel. Timothy I. v. Campbell

Upon petitioner's motion for reconsideration, the court denied reargument and, to the extent the motion could…