From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hooten et al. v. Fed. Land Bk. of Columbia

Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A
Mar 3, 1931
132 So. 693 (Fla. 1931)

Opinion

Decision filed March 3, 1931. Petition for rehearing denied March 28, 1931.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County; J. C. B. Koonce, Judge.

P. C. Gorman, for Appellants;

A. M. Roland, for Appellee.


This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the Decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said Decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said Decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

STRUM, C.J., AND WHITFIELD AND BUFORD, J.J., concur.


Summaries of

Hooten et al. v. Fed. Land Bk. of Columbia

Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A
Mar 3, 1931
132 So. 693 (Fla. 1931)
Case details for

Hooten et al. v. Fed. Land Bk. of Columbia

Case Details

Full title:W. J. HOOTEN and wife ANNIE MAE HOOTEN: SIDNEY M. ROTH and wife EVELYN…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A

Date published: Mar 3, 1931

Citations

132 So. 693 (Fla. 1931)
101 Fla. 1048