From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hooker v. Melton Manor Condominium

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 3, 1995
212 A.D.2d 1049 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 3, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Glownia, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Lawton, Fallon, Wesley and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Plaintiffs failed to raise a question of fact whether defendant had actual or constructive notice of a hazardous condition on the marble steps where plaintiff Robert Hooker fell. "[A] `general awareness' that a dangerous condition may be present is legally insufficient to constitute notice of the particular condition that caused plaintiff's fall" (Piacquadio v. Recine Realty Corp., 84 N.Y.2d 967, 969, quoting Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836, 838). Thus, Supreme Court erred in denying defendant's summary judgment motion.


Summaries of

Hooker v. Melton Manor Condominium

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 3, 1995
212 A.D.2d 1049 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Hooker v. Melton Manor Condominium

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT HOOKER et al., Respondents, v. MELTON MANOR CONDOMINIUM, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 3, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 1049 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
623 N.Y.S.2d 43

Citing Cases

Lupi v. Home Creators, Inc.

At no time before the accident did any party observe water puddling or ice on or beneath the ring floor.…