From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hood v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 16, 1960
334 S.W.2d 302 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960)

Opinion


334 S.W.2d 302 (Tex.Crim.App. 1960) Bennie A. D. HOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 31682. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. March 16, 1960

[169 TEXCRIM 422] Burks & O'Connor by Edwin M. O'Connor, III, Lubbock, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The complaint and information filed after the effective date of Art. 408a, Vernon's Ann. C.C.P., charged two separate violations of the liquor laws in a dry area. Appellant was found guilty under Count 1 for the sale of whisky and assessed a fine of $150; and under Count 2 was convicted for possession of whisky, vodka and beer for the purpose of sale, and assessed a fine of $300.

[169 TEXCRIM 423] Motion to quash the information was filed, directing attention to the new statute (Art. 408a, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P.) providing that not more than one misdemeanor offense may be charged in the same complaint, information or indictment. The motion was overruled.

The trial court erred in overruling the motion to quash. Unless waived, the statute is mandatory. Hill v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 332 S.W.2d 579.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.


Summaries of

Hood v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 16, 1960
334 S.W.2d 302 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960)
Case details for

Hood v. State

Case Details

Full title:Bennie A. D. HOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Mar 16, 1960

Citations

334 S.W.2d 302 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960)

Citing Cases

Drake v. State

R., 332 S.W.2d 579 (1960); Hood v. State, 169 Tex.Crim. R., 334 S.W.2d 302 (1960). In its brief, the State…

Jarnigan v. State

We shall discuss the contentions advanced in the brief. It is appellant's contention that because the…