From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hood v. Attorney Gen.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Aug 6, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-178 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 6, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-178

08-06-2019

ARON HOOD v. ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Aron Hood, a prisoner confined at the Federal Correctional Institution in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act.

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending that this civil action be dismissed.

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record and the pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge (document no. 15) is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.

So ORDERED and SIGNED August 6, 2019.

/s/_________

Ron Clark, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Hood v. Attorney Gen.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Aug 6, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-178 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 6, 2019)
Case details for

Hood v. Attorney Gen.

Case Details

Full title:ARON HOOD v. ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION

Date published: Aug 6, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-178 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 6, 2019)

Citing Cases

Ross v. Sullivan

See 28 C.F.R. § 14.2(a). DOJ's rejection of Plaintiff's claim because it was not signed was not a final…