From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Honig v. Edlill Realty Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 2, 1953
282 App. Div. 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Opinion

July 2, 1953.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Sullivan County.


Appellant objects only to that portion of the order which requires the examination of Thomas Raphael within the State of New York. The order requires the examination of the corporate defendant by Harry C. Resnick, its president, and Thomas Raphael, its secretary and treasurer, in Sullivan County, New York. Resnick, the president, is willing to appear and testify. It appears without dispute that the evidence of Thomas Raphael would be cumulative. It is also without dispute that Thomas Raphael is, and has been for approximately one year prior to the motion, a resident of the State of Florida. His testimony might be acquired by interrogatories or deposition taken there. Under these circumstances we regard it as an unreasonable hardship and unnecessary expense to the defendants to produce him personally for examination in Sullivan County. ( Bolognino v. Anheuser-Busch, 279 App. Div. 819.) Order modified, on the law and facts, by striking therefrom the requirement that Thomas Raphael attend for examination in Sullivan County, New York, and as so modified, the order is affirmed, with $10 costs to appellant. Foster, P.J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Honig v. Edlill Realty Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 2, 1953
282 App. Div. 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)
Case details for

Honig v. Edlill Realty Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL HONIG, Respondent, v. EDLILL REALTY CO., INC., Appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 2, 1953

Citations

282 App. Div. 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Citing Cases

Shepherd v. Swatling

The cross motion seeks to examine one plaintiff who resides in Virginia and another residing in Florida. It…

Harris v. Muriel Sportswear

Since defendant was brought into this action involuntarily and was a foreign corporation resident at a great…