From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Honeycutt v. Wabash Railway Co.

U.S.
Jan 27, 1958
355 U.S. 424 (1958)

Summary

In Honeycutt v. Wabash R. Co., 355 U.S. 424 (1958), the Supreme Court reinstated a verdict for a repairman injured while using a rivet gun with an unprotected trigger, finding that the existence of a safer type of rivet gun justified the jury's finding of negligence.

Summary of this case from Smith v. BNSF Ry. Co.

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE ST. LOUIS COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI.

No. 639.

Decided January 27, 1958.

In this case arising under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, held: The proofs justified the conclusion that employer negligence played a part in producing petitioner's injury. Therefore, certiorari is granted, the judgment reversing a judgment for petitioner is reversed and the case is remanded.

303 S.W.2d 153, reversed and remanded.

Charles E. Gray for petitioner.


The petition for certiorari is granted, and the judgment of the St. Louis Court of Appeals of the State of Missouri is reversed and the case is remanded for proceedings in conformity with this opinion. We hold that the proofs justified with reason the jury's conclusion that employer negligence played a part in producing the petitioner's injury. Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., 352 U.S. 521; Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U.S. 500.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, whom MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER joins, concurs in the result for the reasons given in his memorandum in Gibson v. Thompson, 355 U.S. 18.

For the reasons set forth in his opinion in Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U.S. 500, 524, MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER is of the view that the writ of certiorari is improvidently granted.


Summaries of

Honeycutt v. Wabash Railway Co.

U.S.
Jan 27, 1958
355 U.S. 424 (1958)

In Honeycutt v. Wabash R. Co., 355 U.S. 424 (1958), the Supreme Court reinstated a verdict for a repairman injured while using a rivet gun with an unprotected trigger, finding that the existence of a safer type of rivet gun justified the jury's finding of negligence.

Summary of this case from Smith v. BNSF Ry. Co.
Case details for

Honeycutt v. Wabash Railway Co.

Case Details

Full title:HONEYCUTT v . WABASH RAILWAY CO

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 27, 1958

Citations

355 U.S. 424 (1958)
78 S. Ct. 393

Citing Cases

Zegan v. Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey

The test prescribed by Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 1957, 352 U.S. 500, 506, 507, 77 S.Ct. 443, 1…

Wehrli v. Wabash Railroad Company

Ferguson v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 356 U.S. 41, 78 S.Ct. 671, 2 L.Ed.2d 571. Also in the case of…