Opinion
03-18-2015
In the Matter of Jade YUN HON, respondent, v. TIN YAT CHIN, appellant.
Helene Chowes, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Frederica L. Miller, New York, N.Y., for respondent.
Helene Chowes, New York, N.Y., for appellant.Frederica L. Miller, New York, N.Y., for respondent.
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Dennis Lebwohl, J.), dated March 21, 2014. The order denied the motion of Tin Yat Chin to vacate a final order of protection of that court dated February 21, 2014, which, after an inquest, and upon a finding that he committed family offenses within the meaning of Family Court Act § 812, directed him to stay away from the petitioner and observe other stated conditions of behavior for a period of two years.
ORDERED that the order dated March 21, 2014, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
“A party seeking to vacate an order of protection entered upon his or her default in appearing for a hearing on a family offense petition must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default and a potentially meritorious defense to the petition” (Matter of Nunez v. Lopez, 103 A.D.3d 803, 804, 959 N.Y.S.2d 454 ). “The determination of whether to relieve a party of an order entered upon his or her default is within the sound discretion of the Family Court” (id. at 804, 959 N.Y.S.2d 454 ).
Here, the appellant failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for his default (see Matter of Gloria Marie S., 55 A.D.3d 320, 865 N.Y.S.2d 68 ), and, in any event, failed to demonstrate a potentially meritorious defense to the petition (see Atwater v. Mace, 39 A.D.3d 573, 575, 835 N.Y.S.2d 600 ).
The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.
Accordingly, the Family Court properly denied the appellant's motion to vacate the final order of protection.
RIVERA, J.P., DICKERSON, CHAMBERS and BARROS, JJ., concur.