From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hommell v. Albany Medical Center Hosp., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 3, 1994
209 A.D.2d 772 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 3, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County (Harris, J.).


After this medical malpractice action was commenced against defendant Saratoga Hospital, Inc. (hereinafter defendant), defendant served a notice of appearance and demand for a complaint on October 18, 1993. On November 12, 1993, plaintiffs' counsel made a written request for an extension of time to file a complaint. Defendant did not respond to this request but instead, on December 6, 1993, moved to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b). In response, plaintiffs did not provide an affidavit of merit or a verified complaint, but did move for an extension of time (see, CPLR 2004) on December 15, 1993. Supreme Court denied defendant's motion and granted plaintiffs' motion.

We conclude that plaintiffs' delay here was sufficiently long to require an affidavit of merit (cf., Lehigh Val. R.R. Co. v North Am. Van Lines, 25 A.D.2d 923), and in the absence of the required affidavit of merit, defendant's motion should have been granted (see, Kel Mgt. Corp. v. Rogers Wells, 64 N.Y.2d 904).

Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, Mercure and White, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, cross motion denied, motion granted and action dismissed against defendant Saratoga Hospital, Inc.


Summaries of

Hommell v. Albany Medical Center Hosp., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 3, 1994
209 A.D.2d 772 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Hommell v. Albany Medical Center Hosp., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HENRIETTA HOMMELL et al., Respondents, v. ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER HOSPITAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 3, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 772 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
617 N.Y.S.2d 991

Citing Cases

Imperiale v. Prezioso

On the other hand, when the delay in serving the complaint is more than a few days, the failure to timely…

Imperiale v. Prezioso

On the other hand, when the delay in serving the complaint is more than a few days, the failure to timely…