Opinion
February 2, 1987
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondent Pomirchy, payable by the appellants.
Under the circumstances of this case, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in directing discovery and inspection of the items in question (see, Homburger v. Levitin, 114 A.D.2d 885). Mangano, J.P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.