From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holt v. Legacy HHH

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Apr 4, 2017
SC: 154061 (Mich. Apr. 4, 2017)

Opinion

SC: 154061

04-04-2017

MICHELE HOLT and FLOYD HOLT, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. LEGACY HHH, VHS HARPER-HUTZEL HOSPITAL, INC., and HOLLISTER-WHITNEY ELEVATOR CORPORATION, Defendants, and OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.


Order

154061 & (102) Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice Robert P. Young, Jr. Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 325345
Wayne CC: 13-002501-NO

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 26, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to expand the record is DENIED.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 4, 2017

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Holt v. Legacy HHH

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Apr 4, 2017
SC: 154061 (Mich. Apr. 4, 2017)
Case details for

Holt v. Legacy HHH

Case Details

Full title:MICHELE HOLT and FLOYD HOLT, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. LEGACY HHH, VHS…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Apr 4, 2017

Citations

SC: 154061 (Mich. Apr. 4, 2017)