From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holmes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 17, 2006
923 So. 2d 557 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 1D04-5574.

March 17, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Leon County, Timothy D. Harley, J.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Alexander Dombrowsky, Special Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General; Sherri Tolar Rollison, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Appellant's convictions for both grand theft and grand theft of a motor vehicle violate double jeopardy principles because the items forming the basis for the grand theft charge were not stolen in a distinct criminal act, but simply happened to be inside the car when it was stolen. See Mixson v. State, 857 So.2d 362 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Accordingly, we affirm the conviction and sentence as to Count I, grand theft of a motor vehicle, reverse the conviction as to Count II, grand theft, and direct the lower tribunal to vacate the conviction and sentence as to Count II.

ALLEN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Holmes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 17, 2006
923 So. 2d 557 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Holmes v. State

Case Details

Full title:Johnny HOLMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 17, 2006

Citations

923 So. 2d 557 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. State

Florida courts have continuously held that dual convictions for grand theft auto and theft of property within…

Johnson v. State

Florida courts have continuously held that dual convictions for grand theft auto and theft of property within…