From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holmes v. Holmes

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 5, 1996
676 So. 2d 506 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-2957.

July 9, 1996. Rehearing Denied August 5, 1996.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Charles D. McClure, Judge.

Gary L. Printy, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Larry D. Simpson of Kitchen, Judkins, Simpson High, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Santosh Holmes, the former wife, challenges a final judgment of dissolution. Because on appeal appellant has presented no transcript or statement of the evidence introduced to the court below, we would ordinarily find no basis for disturbing the final judgment which is deemed presumptively correct. Starks v. Starks, 423 So.2d 452 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). The judgment, however, is internally inconsistent. In the judgment the trial court awards certain real property in Nepal to the former wife, but refers to this award both as lump sum alimony and as an asset for equitable distribution. We therefore remand the cause to the trial court for entry of an order or amended judgment clarifying the nature of this real property award. In clarifying this matter, the lower court has the authority to revisit the entire dissolution order, including, if appropriate, electing to retain jurisdiction, so as to fashion an order which is both internally consistent and equitable as to both parties. See, Cloud v. Cloud, 586 So.2d 492 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for clarification.

BOOTH, JOANOS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Holmes v. Holmes

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 5, 1996
676 So. 2d 506 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Holmes v. Holmes

Case Details

Full title:SANTOSH HOLMES, APPELLANT, v. DWIGHT HOLMES, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 5, 1996

Citations

676 So. 2d 506 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Woellmer v. Woellmer

We reverse these aspects of the final judgment and remand to the trial court for clarification. See Holmes v.…