From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holmes v. Hall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Apr 25, 2013
CASE NO. 5:13CV00007 BSM (E.D. Ark. Apr. 25, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:13CV00007 BSM

04-25-2013

MANDRICK HOLMES ADC # 152514, and SHAY HUMPHREY PLAINTIFFS v. DAVID HALL, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The proposed findings and recommended disposition [Doc. No. 5] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration and a de novo review of the record, it is found that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiffs' complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).

2. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith.

_____________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Holmes v. Hall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Apr 25, 2013
CASE NO. 5:13CV00007 BSM (E.D. Ark. Apr. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Holmes v. Hall

Case Details

Full title:MANDRICK HOLMES ADC # 152514, and SHAY HUMPHREY PLAINTIFFS v. DAVID HALL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Apr 25, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 5:13CV00007 BSM (E.D. Ark. Apr. 25, 2013)