From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holmes v. Brewer

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1895
23 S.E. 268 (N.C. 1895)

Opinion

(September Term, 1895.)

Practice — Affirmance of Judgment.

When no error is called to the attention of this Court on appeal, and none appears on the record, the judgment below will be affirmed.

ACTION for the recovery of land, tried before Hoke, J., and a jury at August Term, 1895, of MOORE.

There was a verdict for the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.

Black Adams and W. E. Murchison for plaintiff.

Douglass Spence for defendant.


The defendant has exercised his right of appeal for the pleasure of continuing litigation, or with the hope that something might "turn up" which he could not then foresee, on the theory that accidents will sometimes happen. No error was called to our attention, and on careful examination of the record we are unable to see any. The errors assigned are all overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

(348)


Summaries of

Holmes v. Brewer

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1895
23 S.E. 268 (N.C. 1895)
Case details for

Holmes v. Brewer

Case Details

Full title:PRIMUS HOLMES v. LUCIAN BREWER

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1895

Citations

23 S.E. 268 (N.C. 1895)
117 N.C. 347

Citing Cases

Claywell v. Sudderth

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Cited: Gray v. R. R., post, 299; Williams v. Neville, 108 N.C. 563; McNeill v. Currie,…