Opinion
No. 77-156-L-3, CA 8993
Submitted on record and briefs January 31, affirmed February 13, 1978
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County.
Mitchell Karaman, Judge.
Arthur J. Hollowell, Central Point, filed the briefs for appellant.
John W. Eads, Jr., City Attorney, Medford, filed the brief for respondents.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Thornton and Jospeh, Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
The dispositive issue in this case is whether a layman has a legal right, by virtue of the justice court statutes, to act as an attorney for another in a municipal court. He does not. Balcom v. Municipal Court, 23 Or. App. 218, 541 P.2d 1307, rev den (1975).
See Oregon State Bar v. Wright, 280 Or. 693, 573 P.2d 283 (1977).
Affirmed.