From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holloway v. Magness

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Jun 6, 2008
NO. 5:07CV00088 JLH/BD (E.D. Ark. Jun. 6, 2008)

Opinion

NO. 5:07CV00088 JLH/BD.

June 6, 2008


ORDER


The Court has received the Partial Recommended Disposition from Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. The parties have not filed any objections. After careful review of the Partial Recommended Disposition, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects in its entirety.

Accordingly, Separate Defendant Rory Griffin's motion to dismiss (#90) is GRANTED IN PART, and DENIED IN PART; the ADC Defendants' motion to dismiss (#96) is GRANTED IN PART, and DENIED IN PART; and Separate Defendant GTL's motion to dismiss (#114) is GRANTED IN PART, and DENIED IN PART. All claims against Defendants Dina Tyler are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiffs may proceed against Defendants GTL, Magness, Norris, Lay, and Kelley on their: (1) First Amendment claim, (2) Federal Telecommunications Act claim; and (3) Sherman Antitrust Act Claim. In addition, Plaintiffs may proceed against Defendants Magness, Norris, Kelley, and Lay on their fiduciary duty claim. Plaintiff Holloway may proceed on his due process claim against Defendants Griffin, Magness, Norris, Kelley, and Lay. All other claims against Defendant Griffin are dismissed without prejudice.

The Court also DENIES inmate Jimmy Dyas' motion to intervene (#101).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Holloway v. Magness

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Jun 6, 2008
NO. 5:07CV00088 JLH/BD (E.D. Ark. Jun. 6, 2008)
Case details for

Holloway v. Magness

Case Details

Full title:WINSTON HOLLOWAY ADC # 67507 and JOSEPH BREAULT ADC # 79659 PLAINTIFFS v…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division

Date published: Jun 6, 2008

Citations

NO. 5:07CV00088 JLH/BD (E.D. Ark. Jun. 6, 2008)

Citing Cases

Norris v. Global Tel Link Corp.

Under the filed rate doctrine, "any 'filed rate[,]' that is, one approved by the governing regulatory…