From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hollender v. S.R.F., Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 3, 1975
321 So. 2d 627 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

No. 75-205.

October 31, 1975. Rehearing Denied December 3, 1975.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Culver Smith, J.

Larry Klein, Cone, Wagner, Nugent, Johnson McKeown, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

William H. Pruitt, Prior Pruitt, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


By interlocutory appeal, appellant seeks review of a temporary injunction enjoining her from engaging in employment competitive with plaintiff/appellee, her former employer, with whom she had executed a noncompete agreement.

Appellant urges that the point on appeal is whether the court should enforce the agreement by a temporary injunction where the evidence before the court at the hearing on the application for temporary injunction showed no consideration for the execution of the restrictive agreement. It is apparent that the trial court has made no determination as to the validity of the agreement. Thus, we cannot say from this record that the court abused its discretion in entering the temporary restraining order pending a final determination of this cause, the outcome of which apparently will turn upon the validity of the agreement.

Affirmed.

DOWNEY, J., and NESBITT, JOSEPH, Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Hollender v. S.R.F., Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 3, 1975
321 So. 2d 627 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

Hollender v. S.R.F., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JEAN WILDER HOLLENDER, APPELLANT, v. S.R.F., INC., D/B/A SARA FREDERICKS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 3, 1975

Citations

321 So. 2d 627 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Citing Cases

Capraro v. Lanier Business Products

Even where the validity of the contract is placed in dispute, however, a judge may in his discretion grant a…