From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hollenback v. California Western Railroad

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 28, 1972
465 F.2d 122 (9th Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 26198.

July 28, 1972.

Cyril Viadro (argued), Robert R. Catalano, of Boccardo, Blum, Lull, Niland, Teerlink Bell, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

John H. Sears (argued), Richard S. Hawkinson, of Bronson, Bronson McKinnon, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

Before HAMLEY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and McGOVERN, District Judge.

The Honorable Walter T. McGovern, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation.


Plaintiff appeals from an order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) dismissing his F.E.L.A. action for want of prosecution.

The action was filed September 19, 1966, three years after the alleged injury. After some discovery in August 1967, the file shows no activity until the court on its own motion called the case for dismissal in October 1969. The defendant then moved for dismissal. When the plaintiff furnished the court no valid reason for keeping the case alive, it was dismissed February 18, 1970. Nothing appears in the record to suggest that the district judge abused his discretion.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Hollenback v. California Western Railroad

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 28, 1972
465 F.2d 122 (9th Cir. 1972)
Case details for

Hollenback v. California Western Railroad

Case Details

Full title:FRED HOLLENBACK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CALIFORNIA WESTERN RAILROAD, A…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 28, 1972

Citations

465 F.2d 122 (9th Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

Wuellner v. Crescent Planing Mill Co.

S.W. 855; Yarde v. Hines, 238 S.W. 153; Spaulding v. Lumber Co., 183 Mo. App. 648; James v. Railway, 107 Mo.…

Lock v. Burlington Ry. Co.

S.W. 1072; Elliott v. Railroad, 204 Mo. 14; Winslow v. M., K. T., 192 S.W. 121; Railroad v. Ingram, 187 S.W.…