From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holland v. Holland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1926
218 App. Div. 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Opinion

November, 1926.


Order denying motion to vacate examination of defendants before trial as to the matters contained in 1, 3 and 4 of the notice of examination before trial, modified so as to provide that the examination as to moneys derived from rents, issues and profits of the premises described in the complaint, specified in item 3 of the notice, be limited to rents, issues and profits received during plaintiff's ownership of the premises, and which she alleges were applied to the payment of the mortgage upon the property; and as so modified the order appealed from is affirmed, without costs. We think plaintiff's right to a general accounting of rents and profits received must first be established under the allegation in her complaint, before she is entitled to examine defendants beyond the period above limited. ( Moore v. Reinhardt, 132 App. Div. 707; Del Genovese v. Del Genovese, 149 id. 266.) Order denying motion to resettle affirmed, without costs. Kelly, P.J., Jaycox, Manning, Young and Lazansky, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Holland v. Holland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1926
218 App. Div. 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Case details for

Holland v. Holland

Case Details

Full title:LENA HOLLAND, Respondent, v. SIMON HOLLAND and Others, as Executors and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1926

Citations

218 App. Div. 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)