From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holland v. Hogan

U.S.
Jun 17, 1968
392 U.S. 654 (1968)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

No. 653.

Decided June 17, 1968.

272 F. Supp. 855, vacated and remanded.

Robert Abelow, Marshall C. Berger, and Donald J. Williamson for appellants.

Frank S. Hogan, H. Richard Uviller, and Michael R. Stack, each pro se, and for Yasgur et al., J. Lee Rankin, Norman Redlich, and Stanley Buchsbaum for Adler, and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, and Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Brenda Soloff, Assistant Attorney General, for Lefkowitz, appellees.


The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for further consideration in light of Gardner v. Broderick, ante, p. 273, and George Campbell Painting Corp. v. Reid, ante, p. 286.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.


Summaries of

Holland v. Hogan

U.S.
Jun 17, 1968
392 U.S. 654 (1968)
Case details for

Holland v. Hogan

Case Details

Full title:HOLLAND ET AL. v . HOGAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 17, 1968

Citations

392 U.S. 654 (1968)