From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holgan Bros., Inc. v. Beekman Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 28, 1944
267 App. Div. 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Opinion

January 28, 1944.

Present — Martin, P.J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.


Order denying defendant's motion for summary judgment unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the plaintiff. Order denying plaintiff's motion for leave to serve an amended complaint unanimously reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the plaintiff, and the said motion granted on payment of twenty-five dollars costs to the defendant. A party to an action should be permitted to put his pleading in such form as will enable him to have determined at the trial every question affecting his interest in the subject matter of the litigation. ( Washington Life Ins. Co. v. Scott, 119 App. Div. 847. ) The sufficiency of the proposed amended pleading is not necessarily involved, and is not passed on.


Summaries of

Holgan Bros., Inc. v. Beekman Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 28, 1944
267 App. Div. 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)
Case details for

Holgan Bros., Inc. v. Beekman Hospital

Case Details

Full title:HOLGAN BROS., INC., Respondent-Appellant, v. BEEKMAN HOSPITAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 28, 1944

Citations

267 App. Div. 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Citing Cases

RUDOLPH BASS, INC. v. THOMAS IND

The opposition is grounded upon the claim that the proposed amendment gives information to the contrary of…

Lazarus v. Rice

Present — Martin, P.J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; On a motion for leave to serve an amended…