From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holbrook v. Holbrook

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 1, 1921
130 N.E. 909 (N.Y. 1921)

Opinion

Argued January 12, 1921

Decided February 1, 1921

Henry F. Miller for appellant.

Edward S. Kaufman and Alexander B. Halliday for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CARDOZO, POUND and McLAUGHLIN, JJ. Dissenting: HOGAN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ.


Summaries of

Holbrook v. Holbrook

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 1, 1921
130 N.E. 909 (N.Y. 1921)
Case details for

Holbrook v. Holbrook

Case Details

Full title:CYNTHIA HOLBROOK, an Infant, by ISABEL S. McDONALD, Her Guardian ad Litem…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 1, 1921

Citations

130 N.E. 909 (N.Y. 1921)
130 N.E. 909

Citing Cases

MATTER OF RADT

By the third paragraph it is provided that, in the event of petitioner's predecease, the residuary estate…

Matter of Mulqueen

" The remoteness and uncertainty of the vesting of the gifts for the after-born child are not relevant. So…