From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hohman v. Internal Revenue Serv.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 8, 2018
CASE NUMBER: 16-13282 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 8, 2018)

Opinion

CASE NUMBER: 16-13282

01-08-2018

Jodi Hohman, Plaintiff, v. Internal Revenue Service and Department of the Treasury, Defendant.



MAGISTRATE JUDGE MAJZOUB ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On December 18, 2017, Magistrate Judge Majzoub issued a Report and Recommendation [Doc. 22], recommending that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Neither party filed objections within the fourteen day period pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.

Defendants' motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as follows:

1. The Court substitutes the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration ("TIGTA") in the place of the Department of Treasury.

2. Hohman's FOIA claim against the IRS is DISMISSED AS MOOT, and the IRS's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED in this regard.

3. TIGTA's Motion for Summary Judgment on Hohman's FOIA claim is GRANTED with regard to whether the information was properly exempted from disclosure under Exemption 7(C).

4. TIGTA's Motion for Summary Judgment on Hohman's FOIA claim is
DENIED without prejudice on segregability grounds. TIGTA is directed to produce a Vaughn index that describes each of the documents withheld and the reasons why those documents are non-segregable in sufficient detail to allow the court to make an independent assessment of its claims for non-segregability.

5. The IRS and TIGTA's Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Privacy Act Claim is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Privacy Act claims are DISMISSED.

6. Hohman is permitted to file a motion for attorney's fees and costs against Defendant IRS pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4). She must file such motion on or before February 3, 2018.

IT IS ORDERED.

S/ Victoria A. Roberts

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge Dated: January 8, 2018 The undersigned certifies that a copy of this document was served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on January 8, 2018. S/Linda Vertriest
Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Hohman v. Internal Revenue Serv.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 8, 2018
CASE NUMBER: 16-13282 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 8, 2018)
Case details for

Hohman v. Internal Revenue Serv.

Case Details

Full title:Jodi Hohman, Plaintiff, v. Internal Revenue Service and Department of the…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 8, 2018

Citations

CASE NUMBER: 16-13282 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 8, 2018)

Citing Cases

Nagdy v. United States Dep't of Justice

accord Roman v. U.S. Dept. of State, 1:15-CV-887, 2017 WL 1380039, at *1 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 27, 2017), report…