In Hogan v. Kavanaugh (139 N.Y. 620), which was a motion for reargument, and which is cited by the respondent, the subject of costs was considered by the court.
Summary of this case from Fulton v. KrullSubmitted October 2, 1893
Decided October 10, 1893
Wm. H. Henderson for motion.
D.E. Powell and J.G. Record opposed.
O'BRIEN, J., reads for denial of motion.
All concur.
Motion denied.
In Hogan v. Kavanaugh (139 N.Y. 620), which was a motion for reargument, and which is cited by the respondent, the subject of costs was considered by the court.
Summary of this case from Fulton v. KrullFull title:PHOEBE J. HOGAN, Appellant, v . DANIEL KAVANAUGH et al., Respondents
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 10, 1893
The court heard the new trial as ordered by the General Term, and as an incident to its decision passed upon…