Opinion
Argued June 10, 1940
Decided July 24, 1940
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
Louis Rivkin and Jay Leo Rothschild for appellants.
Arthur H. Ellis and L. Edward Masin for respondents.
Judgments modified by striking out the provision for reformation of the deeds and, as modified, affirmed, with costs to the respondents. The representations contained in the advertisements coupled with the oral representations entitle the plaintiffs to injunctive relief against the defendants but furnish no ground for the reformation of the contract. No opinion.
Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, SEARS and CONWAY, JJ. Taking no part: LEWIS, J.