From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoffman v. Nogaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 1998
247 A.D.2d 365 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

February 2, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant had the initial burden of establishing a prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that the injured plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) ( see, Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955, 956-957). Under the circumstances of this case, the appellant failed to make a sufficient evidentiary showing to entitle him to summary judgment. Since the appellant failed to satisfy his initial burden, the plaintiffs were not required to come forward with proof that the injured plaintiff sustained a serious injury ( see, Rodriguez v. Goldstein, 182 A.D.2d 396).

Bracken, J. P., Pizzuto, Altman, Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hoffman v. Nogaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 1998
247 A.D.2d 365 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Hoffman v. Nogaro

Case Details

Full title:ANNAROSE HOFFMAN, an Infant, by Her Parent and Natural Guardian, VIRGINIA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1998

Citations

247 A.D.2d 365 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
667 N.Y.S.2d 943

Citing Cases

Yanez v. City of New York

However, to be entitled to summary judgment, it is defendant's burden to put forward sufficient evidence that…

Wagner v. Jamieson

To be entitled to summary judgment, it is a defendant's burden “to put forward sufficient evidence that the…