From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoffman v. Chrysler Corp.

U.S.
Apr 26, 1965
380 U.S. 973 (1965)

Opinion

Nos. 893. 954.

April 26, 1965.


Sup. Ct. Del. Certiorari denied. Maximilian Bader and I. Walton Bader for petitioner in No. 893. James J. Leff for petitioner in No. 954. Francis S. Bensel, David W. Peck, Howard T. Milman, S. Samuel Arsht, Milton Pollack and Robert H. Richards, Jr., for Chrysler Corp. et al; Norman S. Nemser, Stanley Nemser and William E. Taylor, Jr., for Gallo et al.; and Lewis M. Dabney, Jr., Herbert Robinson and Daniel O. Hastings for Reiver et al., respondents in both cases. Respondent Dann, pro se, in support of petitionsfor certiorari. Reported below: ___ Del. ___, 205 A. 2d 343.


Summaries of

Hoffman v. Chrysler Corp.

U.S.
Apr 26, 1965
380 U.S. 973 (1965)
Case details for

Hoffman v. Chrysler Corp.

Case Details

Full title:HOFFMAN v. CHRYSLER CORP. ET AL.; and EZZES v. DANN ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 26, 1965

Citations

380 U.S. 973 (1965)

Citing Cases

Dean v. Scott Paper Company, Southern Division

ement Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158; Ala. Cartage Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs,…

Strand v. Hansen Seaway Service, Ltd.

In interpreting the Act, courts have consistently held that sections 10(a) and (b) apply to continuous,…