From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoenig v. Central Stamping Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1936
247 App. Div. 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

April, 1936.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.


Action for damages for personal injuries, brought by plaintiff against the defendant, a manufacturer of a coffee urn with handles, one of which handles, when the urn, filled with hot coffee, was being lifted by the plaintiff, broke away from the body of the urn, thereby causing the contents to flow upon and burn plaintiff, it being alleged that defendant was negligent in the manufacture of the urn and in its inspection and test after manufacture. Judgment in favor of plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs. ( MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 217 N.Y. 382. See, also, Smith v. Peerless Glass Co., 259 id. 292.) Appeal from decision dismissed.


Summaries of

Hoenig v. Central Stamping Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1936
247 App. Div. 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Hoenig v. Central Stamping Company

Case Details

Full title:JOHN HOENIG, Respondent, v. CENTRAL STAMPING COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1936

Citations

247 App. Div. 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

Rowe v. Oscar Ewing Distributing Co.

Since we have in a recent case (C. D. Herme, Inc., v. R. C. Tway Co., Ky., 294 S.W.2d 534) laid to rest the…

Kross v. Kelsey Hayes Company

There was a duty on the defendant to use reasonable care in the manufacture of the pliers. Reasonable care…