From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hodgson v. Bowerbank

U.S.
Jan 1, 1809
9 U.S. 303 (1809)

Opinion

FEBRUARY TERM, 1809.

Martin contended, that the courts of the United States had not jurisdiction, it not being stated that the defendants were citizens of any state.

C. Lee, contra. The judiciary act gives jurisdiction to the circuit courts in all suits in which an alien is a party. Laws U.S. vol. 1. p. 55. § 11.


ERROR to the circuit court for the district of Maryland. The defendants below were described in the record as " late of the district of Maryland, merchants," but were not stated to be citizen's of the state of Maryland. The plaintiffs were described as " aliens and subjects of the king of the united kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland."


Turn to the article of the constitution of the United States, for the statute cannot extend the jurisdiction beyond the limits of the constitution.

(The words of the constitution were found to be " between a state, or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens, or subjects.")

The court said the objection was fatal.

The record was afterwards amended by consent.


Summaries of

Hodgson v. Bowerbank

U.S.
Jan 1, 1809
9 U.S. 303 (1809)
Case details for

Hodgson v. Bowerbank

Case Details

Full title:HODGSON AND THOMPSON v . BOWERBANK AND OTHERS

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 1, 1809

Citations

9 U.S. 303 (1809)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Guggenheim

Amendments of the Constitution, as well as enactment of laws thereunder, are legislative functions. Weight is…

Western v. Bureau

The district court is only empowered to hear those cases that (1) are within the judicial power of the United…