From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hodge v. Hodge Construction

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Dec 21, 1984
359 N.W.2d 572 (Minn. 1984)

Opinion

No. C4-83-1893.

December 21, 1984.

Cortlen G. Cloutier, Minneapolis, for relator.

Peter J. Pustorino, Minneapolis, for respondents.


Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


OPINION


Employee seeks review of a decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals in which the court set aside the compensation judge's contrary determination, and substituted its conclusion that a heart attack sustained by employee on October 23, 1981, did not arise out of and in the course of his employment. Although the WCCA's opinion states that it was aware of the 1983 appellate review amendments to the Workers' Compensation Act, it is not clear they applied the standard of review required by those amendments. See Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie Jaycees, 358 N.W.2d 54 (Minn. 1984). It appears also that the WCCA discounted employee's testimony about his mental stress as "perceived" rather than actual, a distinction rejected by this court in Egeland v. City of Minneapolis, 344 N.W.2d 597, 602-03 (Minn. 1984). Consequently, we remand the matter so the WCCA may reconsider the compensation judge's determination in light of these decisions.

Remanded.


Summaries of

Hodge v. Hodge Construction

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Dec 21, 1984
359 N.W.2d 572 (Minn. 1984)
Case details for

Hodge v. Hodge Construction

Case Details

Full title:Daniel HODGE, Relator, v. HODGE CONSTRUCTION and Aetna Casualty and Surety…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Dec 21, 1984

Citations

359 N.W.2d 572 (Minn. 1984)

Citing Cases

Hodge v. Hodge Const

1984). See Hodge v. Hodge Constr. Co., 359 N.W.2d 572 (Minn. 1984). Having reconsidered its decision, the…