From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hochman v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Dec 21, 1956
265 Ala. 404 (Ala. 1956)

Opinion

1 Div. 700.

December 21, 1956.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Mobile County, D. H. Edington, J.

Chas. Hoffman, Mobile, for petitioner.

John Patterson, Atty. Gen., opposed.


This is a petition by M. Hochman for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the decision of that court in the case of Hochman v. State, 91 So.2d 495.

We have no alternative but to strike the petition because not presented on transcript paper as required by Revised Supreme Court Rule 32, Code 1940, Title 7, Appendix. Duckett v. State, 257 Ala. 589, 60 So.2d 357; Stovall v. State, 257 Ala. 116, 57 So.2d 641; Bates v. General Steel Tank Co., 256 Ala. 466, 55 So.2d 218; Maddox v. City of Birmingham, 255 Ala. 440, 52 So.2d 166; Nix v. State, 251 Ala. 1, 36 So.2d 456; Barnett v. Patillo, 251 Ala. 1, 36 So.2d 451; Anderson v. State, 251 Ala. 32, 36 So.2d 244; Farley v. State, 251 Ala. 391, 37 So.2d 440; Johns v. Thomas H. Vaughn Co., 251 Ala. 489, 38 So.2d 21; Haney v. State, 250 Ala. 664, 36 So.2d 117; Allen v. State, 249 Ala. 201, 30 So.2d 483; Peterson v. State, 248 Ala. 179, 27 So.2d 30; Ex parte Wood, 215 Ala. 280, 110 So. 409; Williams v. State, 258 Ala. 638, 64 So.2d 617.

Petition stricken.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and SIMPSON and GOODWYN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hochman v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Dec 21, 1956
265 Ala. 404 (Ala. 1956)
Case details for

Hochman v. State

Case Details

Full title:M. HOCHMAN v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Dec 21, 1956

Citations

265 Ala. 404 (Ala. 1956)
91 So. 2d 502

Citing Cases

Smith v. State

"'[U]nder our system of pleading, indictments are rather a statement of legal conclusions, than of facts. . .…

Harris v. State

"We are unable to see how the offense could have been more specifically described without pleading…