From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hobbs v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 13, 1968
433 S.W.2d 700 (Tex. Crim. App. 1968)

Opinion

Nos. 41600, 41601.

November 13, 1968.

Appeal from the 177th Judicial District Court, Harris County, Miron A. Love, J.

Jon W. Montague, Houston, for appellant.

Carol S. Vance, Dist. Atty., James C. Brough and James C. Larkin, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, and Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


OPINION


Appellant waived a trial by jury, entered pleas of guilty and executed written judicial confessions. The court found him guilty as charged in the indictment of passing as true a forged instrument in one case and guilty of burglary in the other, and assessed his punishment in the burglary case at 10 years and at 5 years in the Passing case. No effort was made to cumulate the sentences.

One brief has been filed in both cases and so we consolidate them for the purposes of disposition of these appeals.

Counsel who prepared the brief on appeal was not the counsel at the time the pleas of guilty were entered as shown by the record. In the same, numerous assertions of fact and conclusions of law are set forth; but an examination of the transcription of the court reporter's notes contained in these two records on appeal which are approved by the trial court fails to reveal any factual basis for the claims asserted. Such contentions are therefore not before this Court for review.

The judgments are affirmed.


Summaries of

Hobbs v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 13, 1968
433 S.W.2d 700 (Tex. Crim. App. 1968)
Case details for

Hobbs v. State

Case Details

Full title:Vernice George HOBBS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Nov 13, 1968

Citations

433 S.W.2d 700 (Tex. Crim. App. 1968)

Citing Cases

Hodges v. State

However, there is nothing in the record to indicate that a hearing was held on appellant's motion for new…

Briones v. State

This Court is allowed to review only those matters which record. Williams v. State, 485 S.W.2d 274, 275…