From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hobbs v.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 31, 2019
168 A.D.3d 634 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

8283 Index 300562/13

01-31-2019

Anna HOBBS, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Defendant–Appellant.

Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, New York (Patrick J. Lawless of counsel), for appellant. Arnold E. DiJoseph, P.C., New York (Arnold E. DiJoseph of counsel), for respondent.


Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, New York (Patrick J. Lawless of counsel), for appellant.

Arnold E. DiJoseph, P.C., New York (Arnold E. DiJoseph of counsel), for respondent.

Renwick, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Gesmer, Moulton, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Llinet M. Rosado, J.), entered on or about March 6, 2018, which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff slipped on urine in an elevator in one of defendant's buildings sometime between 12:00 a.m. and 1:00 a.m. on Saturday, September 22, 2012. Defendant moved for summary judgment, claiming lack of actual or constructive knowledge of the hazardous condition.

Defendant submitted evidence that custodians were expected to inspect and clean the two elevators in the building twice daily, and that they had "often" responded to reports of urine in the elevators, which they mopped up, but did not record having cleaned. However, defendant presented no evidence at to when the elevator in which plaintiff fell was last inspected or cleaned prior to plaintiff's fall, as required to meet its burden on this motion ( Gautier v. 941 Intervale Realty LLC, 108 A.D.3d 481, 481, 970 N.Y.S.2d 191 [1st Dept. 2013] ).

We have considered defendant's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Hobbs v.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 31, 2019
168 A.D.3d 634 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Hobbs v.

Case Details

Full title:Anna Hobbs, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. New York City Housing Authority…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 31, 2019

Citations

168 A.D.3d 634 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
91 N.Y.S.3d 685
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 686

Citing Cases

Lorimer v. Bd. of Managers of One Madison Ave. Condo.

To meet its prima facie burden on the issue of constructive notice in a slip-and-fall case, a defendant must…

Vicital v. Collins Bldg. Servs.

To meet their prima facie burden on the issue of constructive notice in a slip-and-fall case, defendants must…