From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoback Ranches, Inc. v. Urroz

Supreme Court of Wyoming
Jan 28, 1981
622 P.2d 948 (Wyo. 1981)

Opinion

No. 5441.

January 28, 1981.

Appeal from the District Court, Uinta County, Kenneth G. Hamm, J.

Dennis W. Lancaster, Phillips Lancaster, Evanston, for appellant.

Harry L. Harris, Evanston, for appellee.


ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

There having been noncompliance with Rule 54(b), W.R.C.P., in that the crossclaims of the appellant against the State of Wyoming have not been determined, therefore the liabilities of fewer than all of the parties were determined upon issuance of an order granting partial summary judgment, and there being no express determination that there is no just reason for delay. Hayes v. Nielson, Wyo., 568 P.2d 905 (1977); Olmstead v. Cattle, Inc., Wyo., 541 P.2d 49 (1975); Crossan v. Irrigation Development Corp., Wyo., 598 P.2d 812 (1979), pursuant to Rules 1.04 and 1.05 and 16, W.R.A.P., upon motion to dismiss filed by appellee, Urroz, it is

ORDERED that the entitled appeal be and is dismissed.


Summaries of

Hoback Ranches, Inc. v. Urroz

Supreme Court of Wyoming
Jan 28, 1981
622 P.2d 948 (Wyo. 1981)
Case details for

Hoback Ranches, Inc. v. Urroz

Case Details

Full title:HOBACK RANCHES, INC., A WYOMING CORPORATION, APPELLANT (DEFENDANT BELOW)…

Court:Supreme Court of Wyoming

Date published: Jan 28, 1981

Citations

622 P.2d 948 (Wyo. 1981)

Citing Cases

In re Big Horn River System

Kuehne v. Samedan Oil Corporation, 626 P.2d 1035 (Wyo. 1981); Knudson v. Hilzer, 551 P.2d 680 (Wyo. 1976);…

Stone v. Stone

In discussing finality of an order, this court has said: A judgment or final order must determine all…