Summary
stating that, "[i]n light of the ample evidence available to the prosecutor to impeach any claim of innocence by petitioner had he testified, and the weight of the evidence against petitioner, this Court cannot say that the California Supreme Court's rejection of this ineffective assistance of counsel claim was objectively unreasonable"
Summary of this case from Medina v. WoodfordOpinion
Case No. SACV 08-655 VBF(JC)
10-12-2011
NHA DAC HO, Petitioner, v. JAMES E. TILTON, Director, Respondent.
(PROPOSED) JUDGMENT
Pursuant to this Court's Order Adopting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge,
IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice.
HONORABLE VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE