From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HMV PROPERTIES, LLC v. IDC OHIO HOLDINGS, LLC

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Feb 11, 2010
Case No. 2:08-cv-895 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 11, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 2:08-cv-895.

February 11, 2010


ORDER


On January 22, 2010, Magistrate Judge King issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that Plaintiffs' motion for prejudgment attachment be denied. The parties were advised of their right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation and of the consequences of failing to do so. No objections have been filed within the time allotted.

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 154) and DENIES Plaintiffs' motion for prejudgment attachment (Doc. 56.)

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

HMV PROPERTIES, LLC v. IDC OHIO HOLDINGS, LLC

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Feb 11, 2010
Case No. 2:08-cv-895 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 11, 2010)
Case details for

HMV PROPERTIES, LLC v. IDC OHIO HOLDINGS, LLC

Case Details

Full title:HMV PROPERTIES, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. IDC OHIO HOLDINGS, LLC, et…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Feb 11, 2010

Citations

Case No. 2:08-cv-895 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 11, 2010)

Citing Cases

Swartz v. DiCarlo

It is the movant's burden "to establish a right to attachment by a preponderance of the evidence." HMV…

Hatmaker v. Papa John's Ohio LLC

attachment or execution, and the name of any third person possessing the property.HMV Properties, LLC v. IDC…