From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hlanko v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 20, 1965
23 A.D.2d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Opinion

May 20, 1965


Order, entered October 29, 1964, denying defendant's motion under CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], par. 5) to dismiss the action on the ground that it was not timely brought, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements to any party, and the motion to dismiss the complaint granted. The time within which to bring an action against a Housing Authority is determined by section 157 Pub. Hous. of the Public Housing Law. Plaintiff is not entitled to the benefit of section 50-i Gen. Mun. of the General Municipal Law because that statute is expressly confined to actions against cities, counties, towns, villages, fire districts and school districts. While this makes for an inconsistent statutory pattern when one compares section 50-e Gen. Mun. of the General Municipal Law, the fact remains that the statutes make differential provisions by way of time limitations for instituting an action. The inconsistent statutory pattern requires correction, if any, by the Legislature. The power to correct may not be arrogated by the courts.

Concur — Botein, P.J., Breitel, Valente, Eager and Steuer, JJ. [ 44 Misc.2d 365.]


Summaries of

Hlanko v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 20, 1965
23 A.D.2d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)
Case details for

Hlanko v. New York City Housing Authority

Case Details

Full title:CLAUDIA HLANKO, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 20, 1965

Citations

23 A.D.2d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Citing Cases

Sarmie v. Mohawk Valley General Hospital

Because of the pleadings in this case, wherein it is admitted that defendant is a domestic corporation,…

Louis ex rel. G.A.H. v. N.Y.C. Hous. Auth.

Here, where the defendant is an authority any action premised on negligence "shall be commenced within one…