From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hines v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 21, 1998
714 So. 2d 605 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 97-1203

July 15, 1998 Rehearing and Clarification Denied August 21, 1998

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Robert B. Carney, Judge; L.T. No. 81-8426 CF.

Willie L. Hines, Bowling Green, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carol Cobourn Asbury, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We affirm the order denying Willie Hines' petition for writ of habeas corpus. The trial court found that it lacked jurisdiction over the petition because the appeal from an earlier order denying his motion to correct sentence was pending in this court. That conclusion was incorrect because an appeal of a post-conviction relief matter does not deprive the trial court of jurisdiction where, as here, the issues raised in the two cases are unrelated. Bates v. State, 704 So.2d 562 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Kimmel v. State, 629 So.2d 1110 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Affirmance is required on other grounds. Three of the four issues raised in the petition either should have been argued on direct appeal, or were raised and resolved in earlier postconviction proceedings. On the fourth issue, the appellant failed to demonstrate that his newly discovered evidence might have affected the verdict. Jones v. State, 709 So.2d 512 (Fla.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 118 S.Ct. 1350, 140 L.Ed.2d 499 (1998).

GLICKSTEIN, POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hines v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 21, 1998
714 So. 2d 605 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Hines v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE L. HINES, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 21, 1998

Citations

714 So. 2d 605 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Thurston v. State

The trial court had previously stricken a similar 3.800(a) motion that had raised this precise ground because…

Smith v. State

As the State properly concedes, the pendency of Smith's appeal from denial of an earlier filed Rule 3.850…