From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hines v. Clarke

United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia
Aug 15, 2022
Action 2:20-cv-522 (E.D. Va. Aug. 15, 2022)

Opinion

Action 2:20-cv-522

08-15-2022

DWAYNE DOMINIC HINES, Petitioner, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent.


FINAL ORDER

Robert G. Doumar, United States District Judge

Before the Court is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and the Respondent's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 18. On September 8,2016, the Petitioner was convicted of second degree murder and use of a firearm in the commission of a felony in the Petersburg Circuit Court. Petitioner was sentenced to twenty years on the murder conviction and three years for the firearm conviction. In his petition, the pro se Petitioner challenges the constitutionality of this conviction and sentence.

The matter was referred for disposition to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(B)-(C), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), Local Civil Rule 72, and the April 2, 2002 Standing Order on Assignment of Certain Matters to United States Magistrate Judges. In a Report and Recommendation entered on July 15, 2022, ECF No. 26, the Magistrate Judge recommended the motion to dismiss be granted, and the petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice. The parties were advised of their right to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. Neither the Petitioner nor the Respondent filed objections with the Court.

Having reviewed the record and having heard no objection, the Court agrees with the Report and Recommendation on the grounds stated by the Magistrate Judge and ADOPTS and APPROVES the Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 26, in its entirety as the Court's own opinion. Accordingly, the Respondent's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 18, is GRANTED, and the Petition, ECF No. 1, is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of the Respondent.

The Petitioner is hereby notified that he may appeal from the judgment entered pursuant to this Final Order by filing a written notice of appeal with the Clerk of the Court at the Walter E. Hoffman United States Courthouse, 600 Granby Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23510, within thirty (30) days from the date judgment is entered. Because the Petitioner has failed to demonstrate a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b)(1), the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 335-36 (2003).

The Clerk is DIRECTED to forward a copy of this Order to the Petitioner and counsel of record for the Respondent.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hines v. Clarke

United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia
Aug 15, 2022
Action 2:20-cv-522 (E.D. Va. Aug. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Hines v. Clarke

Case Details

Full title:DWAYNE DOMINIC HINES, Petitioner, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia

Date published: Aug 15, 2022

Citations

Action 2:20-cv-522 (E.D. Va. Aug. 15, 2022)